[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110217054237.GB2653@cr0.nay.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 13:42:37 +0800
From: Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Cypher Wu <cypher.w@...il.com>
Cc: Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: IGMP and rwlock: Dead ocurred again on TILEPro
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 01:04:14PM +0800, Cypher Wu wrote:
>>
>> Have you turned CONFIG_LOCKDEP on?
>>
>> I think Eric already converted that rwlock into RCU lock, thus
>> this problem should disappear. Could you try a new kernel?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>
>I haven't turned CONFIG_LOCKDEP on for test since I didn't get too
>much information when we tried to figured out the former deadlock.
>
>IGMP used read_lock() instead of read_lock_bh() since usually
>read_lock() can be called recursively, and today I've read the
>implementation of MIPS, it's should also works fine in that situation.
>The implementation of TILEPro cause problem since after it use TNS set
>the lock-val to 1 and hold the original value and before it re-set
>lock-val a new value, it a race condition window.
>
I see no reason why you can't call read_lock_bh() recursively,
read_lock_bh() is roughly equalent to local_bh_disable() + read_lock(),
both can be recursive.
But I may miss something here. :-/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists