linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/10] Add yaffs2 file system: Fifth patchset

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 18 Feb 2011 00:01:50 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:	Charles Manning <manningc2@...rix.gen.nz>,
	Ryan Mallon <ryan@...ewatersys.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/10] Add yaffs2 file system:  Fifth patchset

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 03:41:54PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 04:49:57PM +1300, Charles Manning wrote:

> > Stripping out the tracing is easy enough but pointless if people (ie those 
> > actually using yaffs) really want it. Same for the proc interface (though 
> > that could be moved to sysfs).

> Use debugfs please, if it's debugging stuff.  If it's "real" stuff, then
> yes, it should be in sysfs, you already have a place for it in /sys/fs/
> to use.  Just abide by the sysfs rules and you will be fine.

For the proc stuff - for tracing stuff then tracepoints are likely to be
a good option if it's useful to people.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/