[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110218000150.GA27668@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 00:01:50 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc: Charles Manning <manningc2@...rix.gen.nz>,
Ryan Mallon <ryan@...ewatersys.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/10] Add yaffs2 file system: Fifth patchset
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 03:41:54PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 04:49:57PM +1300, Charles Manning wrote:
> > Stripping out the tracing is easy enough but pointless if people (ie those
> > actually using yaffs) really want it. Same for the proc interface (though
> > that could be moved to sysfs).
> Use debugfs please, if it's debugging stuff. If it's "real" stuff, then
> yes, it should be in sysfs, you already have a place for it in /sys/fs/
> to use. Just abide by the sysfs rules and you will be fine.
For the proc stuff - for tracing stuff then tracepoints are likely to be
a good option if it's useful to people.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists