[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110218083928.GU22310@pengutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 09:39:28 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ued.net>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/17] mc13xxx: mfd_cell is now implicitly available to
drivers
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 09:00:36AM -0800, Andres Salomon wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Feb 2011 10:41:54 +0100
> Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 06:19:21PM -0800, Andres Salomon wrote:
> > >
> > > The cell's platform_data is now accessed with a helper function;
> > > change clients to use that, and remove the now-unused data_size.
> > >
> > > Note that mfd-core no longer makes a copy of platform_data, but the
> > why was this changed and where? I'm not able to find your complete
> > series via gmane.
>
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1099164
I still don't get the motivation of your patch set. For drivers that
don't need the mfd_cells you introduce another level of indirection.
And drivers that want to use mfd_cells as platform_data, they can
already now.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists