linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2.6.38-rc5 2/2] block: blk-flush shouldn't call directly into q->request_fn() __blk_run

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110218094903.GF21209@htj.dyndns.org>
Date:	Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:49:03 +0100
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...il.com>
Cc:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2.6.38-rc5 2/2] block: blk-flush shouldn't call
 directly into q->request_fn() __blk_run_queue()

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:01:51AM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> Hi Tejun,
> 
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> > Jens, this is applicable to v2.6.37 and 38.  The new implementation
> > for 39 would need similar fix but I couldn't find where the tree is.
> > Which branch is it?
> 
> for-2.6.39/core

Right, thanks.  Jens, after you apply the two fixes for 2.6.38, I can
create a merge branch for for-2.6.39/core which you can pull.  Would
that work for you?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/