[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D5E8338.8010602@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 07:33:28 -0700
From: David Ahern <daahern@...co.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...e.hu, acme@...stprotocols.net, paulus@...ba.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf events: fix WARN_ON_ONCE for 64-bit raw data,
SW events
On 02/18/11 04:00, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 22:53 -0700, David Ahern wrote:
>> This check does not work out for 64-bit counter:
>>
>> sizeof(u32) + sizeof(u64) = 4 + 8 = 12
>>
>> which does not pass the WARN_ON_ONCE test. I'm guessing (hoping
>> really) that the intent is that the size of the raw data is a
>> multiple of 4 bytes, not 8.
>
> No the data must come in 8bytes strides.
>
Then the sizeof the size field needs to be moved to u64; right now it is
u32:
struct perf_raw_record {
u32 size;
void *data;
};
So size should be changed to u64 rather than modifying the WARN_ON_ONCE?
Another gotcha is in perf_output_sample there is:
struct {
u32 size;
u32 data;
} raw = {
.size = sizeof(u32),
.data = 0,
};
While that meets the 8-byte stride I was concerned that changing the
size field to u64 breaks ABI.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists