linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 3/3] ia64: drop custom exception table implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <987664A83D2D224EAE907B061CE93D53019D4BCC7B@orsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Thu, 17 Feb 2011 17:06:56 -0800
From:	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>
CC:	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] ia64: drop custom exception table implementation

> Nice generalization of the exception code.

Yes - nice to see x86 finally catch up with ia64's compact exception tables :-)

> If Tony acks this patch then we can put the 3 patches into a separate -tip branch 
> and test it on x86 and push it into -next for ia64 testing. That would be the 
> simplest upstream merge route - if that's fine by Tony as well.

It *looks* ok. I didn't get time to try it out - but if it worked
on Jan's test system, then I'm fine to have it thrown into the linux-next
mix so I can pick it up with my regular linux-next tests.

Acked-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>

-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/