[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D5EC184.6000505@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:59:16 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] x86, numa: Do not adjust start/end for early_node_mem()
We have top-down allocation already. So do not bothter to adjust
start/end to make sure get high addr on local hode.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
---
arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c | 9 ++-------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
@@ -164,14 +164,9 @@ static void * __init early_node_mem(int
unsigned long mem;
/*
- * put it on high as possible
- * something will go with NODE_DATA
+ * memblock find will follow top-down, so don't need to adjust
+ * start anymore
*/
- if (start < (MAX_DMA_PFN<<PAGE_SHIFT))
- start = MAX_DMA_PFN<<PAGE_SHIFT;
- if (start < (MAX_DMA32_PFN<<PAGE_SHIFT) &&
- end > (MAX_DMA32_PFN<<PAGE_SHIFT))
- start = MAX_DMA32_PFN<<PAGE_SHIFT;
mem = memblock_x86_find_in_range_node(nodeid, start, end, size, align);
if (mem != MEMBLOCK_ERROR)
return __va(mem);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists