lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:41:45 -0800
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	jbeulich@...ell.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Cc:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/debug] x86: Combine printk()s in show_regs_common()

On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 10:40 +0000, tip-bot for Jan Beulich wrote:
> Commit-ID:  fd8fa4d3ddc4cc04ec8097e632b995d535c52beb
> Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/fd8fa4d3ddc4cc04ec8097e632b995d535c52beb
> Author:     Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>
> AuthorDate: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 15:56:58 +0000
> Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> CommitDate: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:52:30 +0100
> 
> x86: Combine printk()s in show_regs_common()
> 
> Printing a single character alone when there's an immediately
> following printk() is pretty pointless (and wasteful).

Ingo, why did you choose to apply this patch instead of
the alternative one I posted on the same thread?

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/571641/


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ