[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikAF2X1A5jfoNfCPRhZkZ7qPdZ57c8B5b9z4+qr@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 23:42:57 +0000
From: Daniel Drake <dsd@...top.org>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc: cbou@...l.ru, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
dilinger@...ued.net, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] olpc_battery: convert to platform device
On 16 February 2011 22:44, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 22:28 +0000, Daniel Drake wrote:
>>
>> +static int __init add_common_platform_devices(void)
>> +{
>> + struct platform_device *pdev;
>> +
>> + pdev = platform_device_register_simple("olpc-battery", -1, NULL, 0);
>> + if (IS_ERR(pdev))
>> + return PTR_ERR(pdev);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>
> Still kind of sucks that you have to do this, and can't bind to
> something in the device-tree.
OK, feel free to put this patch on hold for now. I started looking at
the device tree approach today. It looks doable but first we have to
fix a DT bug/inconsistency that is preventing us from correctly
binding to the tree's devices.
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists