[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110219183027.GT29493@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 18:30:27 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 12/19] ARM: LPAE: Add context switching support
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 01:24:06PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-02-12 at 10:44 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 05:55:54PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_LPAE
> > > +#define cpu_set_asid(asid) { \
> > > + unsigned long ttbl, ttbh; \
> > > + asm(" mrrc p15, 0, %0, %1, c2 @ read TTBR0\n" \
> > > + " mov %1, %1, lsl #(48 - 32) @ set ASID\n" \
> > > + " mcrr p15, 0, %0, %1, c2 @ set TTBR0\n" \
> > > + : "=r" (ttbl), "=r" (ttbh) \
> > > + : "r" (asid & ~ASID_MASK)); \
> >
> > This is wrong:
> > 1. It does nothing with %2 (the new asid)
> > 2. it shifts the high address bits of TTBR0 left 16 places each time its
> > called.
>
> It was worse actually, not even compiled in because it had output
> arguments but it wasn't volatile. Some early clobber is also needed.
> What about this:
>
> #define cpu_set_asid(asid) { \
> unsigned long ttbl, ttbh; \
> asm volatile( \
> " mrrc p15, 0, %0, %1, c2 @ read TTBR0\n" \
> " mov %1, %2, lsl #(48 - 32) @ set ASID\n" \
> " mcrr p15, 0, %0, %1, c2 @ set TTBR0\n" \
> : "=&r" (ttbl), "=&r" (ttbh) \
> : "r" (asid & ~ASID_MASK)); \
> }
So we don't care about the low 16 bits of ttbh which can be simply zeroed?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists