[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110220175709.GA5178@merkur.ravnborg.org>
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 18:57:09 +0100
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: Add extra gcc checks
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 05:35:10PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Add a 'W=1' Makefile switch which adds additional checking per build
> object.
>
> The idea behind this option is targeted at developers who, in the
> process of writing their code, want to do the occasional
>
> make W=1 [target.o]
>
> and let gcc do more extensive code checking for them. Then, they
> could eyeball the output for valid gcc warnings about various
> bugs/discrepancies which are not reported during the normal build
> process.
>
> For more background information and a use case, read through this
> thread: http://marc.info/?i=20110218091716.GA4384@bicker
>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
> Cc: linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> ---
> Makefile | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
I like the idea.
But can we avoid polluting the top-level Makefile?
That file is full of unreadable stuff, and adding more
is not good.
Makefile.lib or Makefile.build seems like a better place for this.
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists