linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kprobes - do not allow optimized kprobes in entry code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 20 Feb 2011 13:59:48 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	ananth@...ibm.com, davem@...emloft.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	"2nddept-manager@....hitachi.co.jp" 
	<2nddept-manager@....hitachi.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kprobes - do not allow optimized kprobes in entry code

* Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com> wrote:

> Thanks, I've also tested. (But my machine has no L1-icache-prefetches* support) 
> What I can tell is both of L1-icache-load and L1-icache-load-misses is reduced by 
> the patch. ;-)

That's actually a pretty interesting result: it means that compressing entry code 
into a single section compresses the icache footprint in a measurable way. The 
icache miss rate went down by about 6%:

>          1,234,272 L1-icache-load-misses      ( +-   0.105% )
>          1,155,816 L1-icache-load-misses      ( +-   0.113% )

Which, assuming that there's no kernel build and bootup related skew effect that is 
larger than 2-3% means that this is an improvement.

perf feature request: would be nice if it was able to do:

	perf stat --record ...
	perf diff

and it would show a comparison of the two runs.

In hindsight it makes sense: the patch probably reduced the fragmentation of the 
icache for this workload.

But it's still surprising :-)

Mind splitting the patch up into two parts, the first one that does the performance 
optimization intentionally (with numbers, explanation, etc.), the second one that 
uses the new section for kprobes exclusion?

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/