| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20110220132115.GC3514@viiv.ffwll.ch> Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 14:21:16 +0100 From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch> To: Indan Zupancic <indan@....nu> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [BUG] drm/i915 Screen corruption introduced by a00b10c360b35d6431a94cb On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 12:19:14PM +0100, Indan Zupancic wrote: > Hi, > > Good news: > > On Sun, February 20, 2011 11:55, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >> > I've created two quick patches to check a few theories, please test them > >> > (both patches independently and both together). Patches attached. > >> > >> Tried with both applied, doesn't change anything. > > > > I've just noticed that one of the patches (the 2nd one) doesn't work as > > advertised. Please retest with the attached one. > > This one fixes it! Well, don't start jumping around, yet. These patches are just to rule out some theories. Now: Is it fixed with just the 2nd patch alone or do you need both patches? This is very important, so please test extensively whether there are really no corruptions with just the 2nd patch. Yours, Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Mail: daniel@...ll.ch Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists