[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110221115839.2048e8fe@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 11:58:39 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...sta.com>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/20] ata_piix: unify code for programming PIO and
MWDMA timings
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 14:38:37 +0300
Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...sta.com> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 21-02-2011 0:07, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> >> PIO mode is setup by different code, and it takes care of the IORDY
> >> setting according to the PIO rules (and it gets called). DMA mode setup should
> >> just ignore the IORDY setting as in all other sane drivers.
>
> > Well it can't ignore it - but if you mean just keep the bit as is then
>
> Yes, I mean this.
>
> > that sounds sensible, have to see what the docs say happens if you ever
> > set MWDMA without IORDY.
>
> Don't think they say anything on this matter but I can't imagine that
> IORDY matters for DMA.
Sure - but it does matter for an ATAPI transaction with then has a DMA
phase because those timings will be used for the command transfer which
is PIO.
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists