[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D63C753.3030906@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:25:23 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
CC: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] KVM: sort memslots and use binary search to search
the right slot
On 02/22/2011 10:12 AM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> Sort memslots then search the slot with binary search to speed up the
> slot searching
>
I'm not sure if a binary search is the right algorithm here. It
introduces a lot of branches which may be mispredicted.
Options we've discussed are:
- Sort slots by size, use linear search (so the largest slots are found
quickly)
- Weighted balanced tree
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weight-balanced_tree, use weight == slot size
Both options still make the miss case (mmio) slow. We could cache the
result of a miss in an spte by using a reserved bit, and checking the
page fault error code (or seeing if we get an ept violation or ept
misconfiguration), so if we get repeated mmio on a page, we don't need
to search the slot list/tree.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists