[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D63D062.3040404@versanet.de>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:04:02 +0100
From: "pantherchen@...sanet.de" <pantherchen@...sanet.de>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
CC: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Boot time regression in 2.6.38 after initial wq merge
On 02/22/2011 10:15 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> I'd like to see rc6 tried.
Unfortunately it shows the same behavior [0]. (To speed things up, I
used a stripped down kernel config [1], while the first two posted boot
charts used Ubuntu's stock kernels.)
I was surprised that the kernel directly built from the wq branch and
the last "good" kernel from Linus' tree with the 33 patches applied
don't show the increased boot time - shouldn't they all be the same?
About the system: Lenovo ThinkPad T510 with an Core i5-560m, 6 GB RAM, a
SSD, and hybrid graphics (can boot from either the Intel HD or the
Nvidia NVS 3100M - regression shows up with both).
The system is running an up-to-date Ubuntu dev release (Natty) with Xorg
7.6(~3ubuntu7), Xserver 1.9.99.901+git20110131.be3be758(-0ubuntu6), and
Plymouth 0.8.2(-2ubuntu17) FWIW.
Thanks,
Hernando Torque
[0]: http://img.xrmb2.net/images/576186.png
[1]: http://paste.ubuntu.com/570595/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists