[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110222181647.GA25569@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:16:48 -0800
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>
Cc: rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
Marcelo Roberto Jimenez <mroberto@...i.cetuc.puc-rio.br>
Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] [PATCH 04/10] RTC: Cleanup
rtc_class_ops->read_alarm()
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 12:09:38AM -0800, john stultz wrote:
> Just so I can better get a grip of the cases your considering, could you
> maybe give me some more detailed examples of where you'd like to see the
> alarm timer be set and then persist across multiple power cycles before
> firing? And how is that persistent value managed by the application
> setting it?
The WM83xx RTCs can do this (the alarm can be used to initiate a boot)
and I'd expect many embedded RTC controllers can do similar. The
application would manage this by owning the RTC in the system, usually
with a configuration saying something like "boot every day at 7am" or
something.
Having thought about this a bit I'm thinking that this sort of alarm
handling is probably something I'd expect to see handled in userspace.
I can see us providing a virtual RTC driver that can generate alarms
when there's no actual RTC hardware but adding additional functionality
on top of the hardware feels like an application issue.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists