[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1102221402150.5929@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:08:56 -0800 (PST)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>, lwoodman@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] Add __GFP_OTHER_NODE flag
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > This makes the accounting worse, NUMA_LOCAL is defined as "allocation from
> > local node," meaning it's local to the allocating cpu, not local to the
> > node being targeted.
>
> Local to the process really (and I defined it originally ...) That is what
> I'm implementing
>
> I don't think "local to some random kernel daemon which changes mappings on
> behalf of others"
> makes any sense as semantics.
>
You could make the same argument for anything using kmalloc_node() since
preferred_zone may very well not be on the allocating cpu's node. So you
either define NUMA_LOCAL to account for when a cpu allocates memory local
to itself (as it's name implies) or you define it to account for when
memory comes from the preferred_zone's node as determined by the zonelist.
It's not useful to change it from the former to the latter since it's
already the definition of NUMA_HIT.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists