[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110223030940.GB5809@nowhere>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 04:09:43 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, josh@...htriplett.org,
niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, dhowells@...hat.com,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, darren@...art.com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 11/11] rcu: move TREE_RCU from softirq
to kthread
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 05:39:40PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> +/*
> + * Set the per-rcu_node kthread's affinity to cover all CPUs that are
> + * served by the rcu_node in question.
> + */
> +static void rcu_node_kthread_setaffinity(struct rcu_node *rnp)
> +{
> + cpumask_var_t cm;
> + int cpu;
> + unsigned long mask = rnp->qsmaskinit;
> +
> + if (rnp->node_kthread_task == NULL ||
> + rnp->qsmaskinit == 0)
> + return;
> + if (!alloc_cpumask_var(&cm, GFP_KERNEL))
> + return;
> + cpumask_clear(cm);
> + for (cpu = rnp->grplo; cpu <= rnp->grphi; cpu++, mask <<= 1)
There seem to be the same shift problem here.
> + if (mask & 01)
> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, cm);
> + set_cpus_allowed_ptr(rnp->node_kthread_task, cm);
> + free_cpumask_var(cm);
> +}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists