lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-8635bf6ea3402154eec64763e6ed14972013c1c1@git.kernel.org>
Date:	Wed, 23 Feb 2011 07:34:45 GMT
From:	tip-bot for Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, eranian@...gle.com, paulus@...ba.org,
	acme@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
	tzanussi@...il.com, peterz@...radead.org, efault@....de,
	masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:perf/core] perf probe: Remove redundant checks

Commit-ID:  8635bf6ea3402154eec64763e6ed14972013c1c1
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/8635bf6ea3402154eec64763e6ed14972013c1c1
Author:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
AuthorDate: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 06:56:18 -0300
Committer:  Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
CommitDate: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 07:02:07 -0300

perf probe: Remove redundant checks

While fixing an error propagating problem in f809b25 I added two
redundant checks.

I did that because I didn't expect the checks to be on the while and for
loop condition expression, where they are tested before we run the loop,
where the 'ret' variable is set.

So remove it from there and leave it just after it is actually set,
eliminating unneded tests.

Reported-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
---
 tools/perf/util/probe-event.c  |    2 +-
 tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c |    5 ++---
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
index 369ddc6..5ddee66 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
@@ -1832,7 +1832,7 @@ int add_perf_probe_events(struct perf_probe_event *pevs, int npevs,
 	}
 
 	/* Loop 2: add all events */
-	for (i = 0; i < npevs && ret >= 0; i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < npevs; i++) {
 		ret = __add_probe_trace_events(pkgs[i].pev, pkgs[i].tevs,
 						pkgs[i].ntevs, force_add);
 		if (ret < 0)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
index eecbdca..17f9c4a 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
@@ -1462,8 +1462,7 @@ static int find_probes(int fd, struct probe_finder *pf)
 	off = 0;
 	line_list__init(&pf->lcache);
 	/* Loop on CUs (Compilation Unit) */
-	while (!dwarf_nextcu(dbg, off, &noff, &cuhl, NULL, NULL, NULL) &&
-	       ret >= 0) {
+	while (!dwarf_nextcu(dbg, off, &noff, &cuhl, NULL, NULL, NULL)) {
 		/* Get the DIE(Debugging Information Entry) of this CU */
 		diep = dwarf_offdie(dbg, off + cuhl, &pf->cu_die);
 		if (!diep)
@@ -1484,7 +1483,7 @@ static int find_probes(int fd, struct probe_finder *pf)
 				pf->lno = pp->line;
 				ret = find_probe_point_by_line(pf);
 			}
-			if (ret != DWARF_CB_OK)
+			if (ret < 0)
 				break;
 		}
 		off = noff;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ