[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikNjMZitsq-XxKMs9hN4Q238tATMpkOwQ_xLk89@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 09:53:58 +0100
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...sta.com>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/20] pata_efar: always program master_data before slave_data
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
<bzolnier@...il.com> wrote:
> As for increased memory usage -- we are talking here only about 10-20k
> more. If it really is a problem maybe ata_piix can be redesigned into
> ata_generic-style manner so with the help of existing config options
> we can keep code size / memory usage on a existing level.
s/ata_generic/pata_legacy/ of course -- what I have in mind is making
Intel specific code depended on ATA_PIIX and adding new config option
ATA_PIIXALIKE for generic code which would be selected by existing
PATA_[EFAR,IT8213, OLDPIIX,RADISYS,RDC] options.
Thanks,
Bartlomiej
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists