[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110223115337.GB12398@ghostprotocols.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 08:53:37 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Funny perf
Em Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 11:21:48AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra escreveu:
> On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 19:26 +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > so this looks like some of the samples do not belong in the perf.data
> > output with that garbled cpu field. It lets me also assume that the
> > sample->time field is also crap so the timestamp check is falsely
> > tripped.
>
> Most interesting, I haven't tried to reproduce, but it does sound
> smelly.
>
> I did have a quick peek at some code I suspected but that all seems in
> order. I guess someone will have to sit down and figure this out proper,
> if nobody steps up I guess it'll have to be me, but that also means it
> might take a while since I've got some other pending stuff to stare at
> before this :/
I'll look at it today.
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists