[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110223121726.GR1898@bicker>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:17:26 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
To: Martyn Welch <martyn.welch@...com>
Cc: Manohar Vanga <manohar.vanga@...n.ch>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
cota@...ap.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Staging: vme: remove unreachable code
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 09:19:06AM +0000, Martyn Welch wrote:
> On 22/02/11 19:36, Manohar Vanga wrote:
> > Remove unreachable code from vme_register_bridge
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Manohar Vanga <manohar.vanga@...n.ch>
Please always CC the list. It's going to be Greg to commit this
code so CC Greg as well.
./scripts/get_maintainer.pl patch.diff
(Although you should generally remove Tejun from the CC list.)
>
> Yeah - that's there from development. If the function needed to be extended,
> that's the next part of the error path.
Don't do that. Kernel style is austere. Anything that isn't needed
here and now should be removed.
> > --- a/drivers/staging/vme/vme.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/vme/vme.c
> > @@ -1363,7 +1363,6 @@ int vme_register_bridge(struct vme_bridge *bridge)
> >
> > return retval;
> >
> > - i = VME_SLOTS_MAX;
> > err_reg:
> > while (i > -1) {
> > dev = &bridge->dev[i];
There are two problems with this loop. 1) It unregisters the device
which failed to register. 2) It is a forever loop.
It should be:
while (--i >= 0) {
dev = &bridge->dev[i];
Can you fix that up as well and resend.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists