lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1298467934.2217.767.camel@twins>
Date:	Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:32:14 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>,
	Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ibm.com>,
	Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
	Herbert Poetzl <herbert@...hfloor.at>,
	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
	Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>,
	Nikhil Rao <ncrao@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [CFS Bandwidth Control v4 1/7] sched: introduce primitives to
 account for CFS bandwidth tracking

On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 19:18 -0800, Paul Turner wrote:

> @@ -245,6 +248,15 @@ struct cfs_rq;
>  
>  static LIST_HEAD(task_groups);
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
> +struct cfs_bandwidth {
> +	raw_spinlock_t		lock;
> +	ktime_t			period;
> +	u64			runtime, quota;
> +	struct hrtimer		period_timer;
> +};
> +#endif

If you write that as:

struct cfs_bandwidth {
#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
	...
#endif
};

>  /* task group related information */
>  struct task_group {
>  	struct cgroup_subsys_state css;
> @@ -276,6 +288,10 @@ struct task_group {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_AUTOGROUP
>  	struct autogroup *autogroup;
>  #endif
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
> +	struct cfs_bandwidth cfs_bandwidth;
> +#endif
>  };

You can avoid the #ifdef'ery here

>  /* task_group_lock serializes the addition/removal of task groups */
> @@ -370,9 +386,76 @@ struct cfs_rq {

> +#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
> +static int do_sched_cfs_period_timer(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b, int overrun);
> +
> +static enum hrtimer_restart sched_cfs_period_timer(struct hrtimer *timer)
> +{
> +	struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b =
> +		container_of(timer, struct cfs_bandwidth, period_timer);
> +	ktime_t now;
> +	int overrun;
> +	int idle = 0;
> +
> +	for (;;) {
> +		now = hrtimer_cb_get_time(timer);
> +		overrun = hrtimer_forward(timer, now, cfs_b->period);
> +
> +		if (!overrun)
> +			break;
> +
> +		idle = do_sched_cfs_period_timer(cfs_b, overrun);
> +	}
> +
> +	return idle ? HRTIMER_NORESTART : HRTIMER_RESTART;
> +}
> +
> +static
> +void init_cfs_bandwidth(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b, u64 quota, u64 period)
> +{
> +	raw_spin_lock_init(&cfs_b->lock);
> +	cfs_b->quota = cfs_b->runtime = quota;
> +	cfs_b->period = ns_to_ktime(period);
> +
> +	hrtimer_init(&cfs_b->period_timer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
> +	cfs_b->period_timer.function = sched_cfs_period_timer;
> +}
> +
> +static
> +void init_cfs_rq_quota(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
> +{
> +	cfs_rq->quota_used = 0;
> +	if (cfs_rq->tg->cfs_bandwidth.quota == RUNTIME_INF)
> +		cfs_rq->quota_assigned = RUNTIME_INF;
> +	else
> +		cfs_rq->quota_assigned = 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void start_cfs_bandwidth(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b)
> +{
> +	if (cfs_b->quota == RUNTIME_INF)
> +		return;
> +
> +	if (hrtimer_active(&cfs_b->period_timer))
> +		return;
> +
> +	raw_spin_lock(&cfs_b->lock);
> +	start_bandwidth_timer(&cfs_b->period_timer, cfs_b->period);
> +	raw_spin_unlock(&cfs_b->lock);
> +}
> +
> +static void destroy_cfs_bandwidth(struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b)
> +{
> +	hrtimer_cancel(&cfs_b->period_timer);
> +}
> +#endif

and #else

stubs
#endif

>  /* Real-Time classes' related field in a runqueue: */
>  struct rt_rq {
>  	struct rt_prio_array active;
> @@ -8038,6 +8121,9 @@ static void init_tg_cfs_entry(struct tas
>  	tg->cfs_rq[cpu] = cfs_rq;
>  	init_cfs_rq(cfs_rq, rq);
>  	cfs_rq->tg = tg;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
> +	init_cfs_rq_quota(cfs_rq);
> +#endif

also avoids #ifdef'ery here

>  	tg->se[cpu] = se;
>  	/* se could be NULL for root_task_group */
> @@ -8173,6 +8259,10 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
>  		 * We achieve this by letting root_task_group's tasks sit
>  		 * directly in rq->cfs (i.e root_task_group->se[] = NULL).
>  		 */
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
> +		init_cfs_bandwidth(&root_task_group.cfs_bandwidth,
> +				RUNTIME_INF, sched_cfs_bandwidth_period);
> +#endif

and here

>  		init_tg_cfs_entry(&root_task_group, &rq->cfs, NULL, i, NULL);
>  #endif /* CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */
>  
> @@ -8415,6 +8505,10 @@ static void free_fair_sched_group(struct
>  {
>  	int i;
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
> +	destroy_cfs_bandwidth(&tg->cfs_bandwidth);
> +#endif

and here

>  	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
>  		if (tg->cfs_rq)
>  			kfree(tg->cfs_rq[i]);
> @@ -8442,7 +8536,10 @@ int alloc_fair_sched_group(struct task_g
>  		goto err;
>  
>  	tg->shares = NICE_0_LOAD;
> -
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
> +	init_cfs_bandwidth(&tg->cfs_bandwidth, RUNTIME_INF,
> +			sched_cfs_bandwidth_period);
> +#endif

and here

>  	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
>  		rq = cpu_rq(i);
>  

> @@ -9107,6 +9204,116 @@ static u64 cpu_shares_read_u64(struct cg
>  
>  	return (u64) tg->shares;
>  }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
> +static int tg_set_cfs_bandwidth(struct task_group *tg, u64 period, u64 quota)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	static DEFINE_MUTEX(mutex);
> +
> +	if (tg == &root_task_group)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (!period)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Ensure we have at least one tick of bandwidth every period.  This is
> +	 * to prevent reaching a state of large arrears when throttled via
> +	 * entity_tick() resulting in prolonged exit starvation.
> +	 */
> +	if (NS_TO_JIFFIES(quota) < 1)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&mutex);
> +	raw_spin_lock_irq(&tg->cfs_bandwidth.lock);
> +	tg->cfs_bandwidth.period = ns_to_ktime(period);
> +	tg->cfs_bandwidth.runtime = tg->cfs_bandwidth.quota = quota;
> +	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&tg->cfs_bandwidth.lock);
> +
> +	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
> +		struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = tg->cfs_rq[i];
> +		struct rq *rq = rq_of(cfs_rq);
> +
> +		raw_spin_lock_irq(&rq->lock);
> +		init_cfs_rq_quota(cfs_rq);
> +		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rq->lock);

Any particular reason you didn't mirror rt_rq->rt_runtime_lock?

> +	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&mutex);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}


> Index: tip/kernel/sched_fair.c
> ===================================================================
> --- tip.orig/kernel/sched_fair.c
> +++ tip/kernel/sched_fair.c
> @@ -88,6 +88,15 @@ const_debug unsigned int sysctl_sched_mi
>   */
>  unsigned int __read_mostly sysctl_sched_shares_window = 10000000UL;
>  
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
> +/*
> + * default period for cfs group bandwidth.
> + * default: 0.5s, units: nanoseconds
> + */
> +static u64 sched_cfs_bandwidth_period = 500000000ULL;
> +#endif
> +
>  static const struct sched_class fair_sched_class;
>  
>  /**************************************************************
> @@ -397,6 +406,9 @@ static void __enqueue_entity(struct cfs_
>  
>  	rb_link_node(&se->run_node, parent, link);
>  	rb_insert_color(&se->run_node, &cfs_rq->tasks_timeline);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CFS_BANDWIDTH
> +	start_cfs_bandwidth(&cfs_rq->tg->cfs_bandwidth);
> +#endif
>  }

This really needs to life elsewhere, __*_entity() functions are for
rb-tree muck.
 
>  static void __dequeue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ