[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D6462F1.50504@hitachi.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:29:21 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>,
"2nddept-manager@....hitachi.co.jp"
<2nddept-manager@....hitachi.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf probe: Remove redundant checks
(2011/02/23 3:53), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
>
> While fixing an error propagating problem in f809b25 I added two
> redundant checks.
>
> I did that because I didn't expect the checks to be on the while and for
> loop condition expression, where they are tested before we run the loop,
> where the 'ret' variable is set.
>
> So remove it from there and leave it just after it is actually set,
> eliminating unneded tests.
Thanks, that's good for me :)
Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
>
> Reported-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
> Cc: Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>
> LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/probe-event.c | 2 +-
> tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c | 5 ++---
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
> index 369ddc6..5ddee66 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-event.c
> @@ -1832,7 +1832,7 @@ int add_perf_probe_events(struct perf_probe_event *pevs, int npevs,
> }
>
> /* Loop 2: add all events */
> - for (i = 0; i < npevs && ret >= 0; i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < npevs; i++) {
> ret = __add_probe_trace_events(pkgs[i].pev, pkgs[i].tevs,
> pkgs[i].ntevs, force_add);
> if (ret < 0)
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c b/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
> index eecbdca..17f9c4a 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/probe-finder.c
> @@ -1462,8 +1462,7 @@ static int find_probes(int fd, struct probe_finder *pf)
> off = 0;
> line_list__init(&pf->lcache);
> /* Loop on CUs (Compilation Unit) */
> - while (!dwarf_nextcu(dbg, off, &noff, &cuhl, NULL, NULL, NULL) &&
> - ret >= 0) {
> + while (!dwarf_nextcu(dbg, off, &noff, &cuhl, NULL, NULL, NULL)) {
> /* Get the DIE(Debugging Information Entry) of this CU */
> diep = dwarf_offdie(dbg, off + cuhl, &pf->cu_die);
> if (!diep)
> @@ -1484,7 +1483,7 @@ static int find_probes(int fd, struct probe_finder *pf)
> pf->lno = pp->line;
> ret = find_probe_point_by_line(pf);
> }
> - if (ret != DWARF_CB_OK)
> + if (ret < 0)
> break;
> }
> off = noff;
--
Masami HIRAMATSU
2nd Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Systems Development Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists