[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimp0moaqnRfn8hp_TQJxdh7G8ODG_SkwO_hz8kE@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:22:33 -0700
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 14/15] dt: Eliminate of_platform_{,un}register_driver
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com> wrote:
> Grant,
>
> On 02/22/2011 10:34 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
>>
>> Final step to eliminate of_platform_bus_type. They're all just
>> platform drivers now.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely<grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
>> ---
>
> snip
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
>> b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
>> index b6ae6e9..132951d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
>> +++ b/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
>> @@ -2556,8 +2556,7 @@ static struct pci_driver ipmi_pci_driver = {
>>
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_OF
>> -static int __devinit ipmi_of_probe(struct platform_device *dev,
>> - const struct of_device_id *match)
>> +static int __devinit ipmi_of_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
>> {
>> struct smi_info *info;
>> struct resource resource;
>> @@ -2568,6 +2567,9 @@ static int __devinit ipmi_of_probe(struct
>> platform_device *dev,
>>
>> dev_info(&dev->dev, "probing via device tree\n");
>>
>> + if (!dev->dev.of_match)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> ret = of_address_to_resource(np, 0,&resource);
>> if (ret) {
>> dev_warn(&dev->dev, PFX "invalid address from OF\n");
>> @@ -2600,7 +2602,7 @@ static int __devinit ipmi_of_probe(struct
>> platform_device *dev,
>> return -ENOMEM;
>> }
>>
>> - info->si_type = (enum si_type) match->data;
>> + info->si_type = (enum si_type) dev->dev.of_match->data;
>> info->addr_source = SI_DEVICETREE;
>> info->irq_setup = std_irq_setup;
>>
>> @@ -2652,9 +2654,9 @@ static struct of_device_id ipmi_match[] =
>> {},
>> };
>>
>> -static struct of_platform_driver ipmi_of_platform_driver = {
>> +static struct platform_driver ipmi_of_platform_driver = {
>> .driver = {
>> - .name = "ipmi",
>> + .name = "of-ipmi",
>> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>> .of_match_table = ipmi_match,
>> },
>> @@ -3396,7 +3398,7 @@ static int __devinit init_ipmi_si(void)
>> #endif
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_OF
>> - of_register_platform_driver(&ipmi_of_platform_driver);
>> + platform_driver_register(&ipmi_of_platform_driver);
>> of_registered = 1;
>> #endif
>>
>> @@ -3457,7 +3459,7 @@ static int __devinit init_ipmi_si(void)
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_OF
>> if (of_registered)
>> -
>> of_unregister_platform_driver(&ipmi_of_platform_driver);
>> +
>> platform_driver_unregister(&ipmi_of_platform_driver);
>> #endif
>> driver_unregister(&ipmi_driver.driver);
>> printk(KERN_WARNING PFX
>> @@ -3558,7 +3560,7 @@ static void __exit cleanup_ipmi_si(void)
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_OF
>> if (of_registered)
>> - of_unregister_platform_driver(&ipmi_of_platform_driver);
>> + platform_driver_unregister(&ipmi_of_platform_driver);
>> #endif
>>
>> mutex_lock(&smi_infos_lock);
>
> Um, you are doing exactly what you said I should not do. Now the driver has
> 2 platform drivers defined. I have an updated patch that addresses your
> previous comments. I will send it out later today.
Thanks. I wacked this whole series out one evening and converted all
the drivers at once, so it's not surprising that I missed some
duplications. Send me your patch and I'll drop my changes here.
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists