lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=wtxzKGHXgtoUsV8J4O3NUYdz9PGHi-sdd-Osy@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 23 Feb 2011 11:26:42 -0800
From:	Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>
To:	Ben Dooks <ben-i2c@...ff.org>
Cc:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
	swarren@...dia.com, patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
	linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: tegra: Add i2c support

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Ben Dooks <ben-i2c@...ff.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 05:14:21PM -0800, Colin Cross wrote:
>> Adds I2C bus driver for nVidia Tegra SoCs.  Tegra includes 4 I2C
>> controllers, one of which is inside the Dynamic Voltage Controller
>> and has a slightly different register map.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>
>
> Would have been helpful to start a new thread, missed this the first time
> around.
>
>> +     i2c_dev = kzalloc(sizeof(struct tegra_i2c_dev), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +     if (!i2c_dev) {
>
> no error print here.
>
>> +             ret = -ENOMEM;
>> +             goto err_i2c_clk_put;
>> +     }
>
>> +     if (pdev->id == 3)
>> +             i2c_dev->is_dvc = 1;
>> +     init_completion(&i2c_dev->msg_complete);
>
> you might want to think about having a seperate platform bus name for
> this case, and switching the is_dvc field on that. It'll make life much
> easier if someone decides that what the next tegra i2c needs is 5 i2c
> controllers.
>
> I'll consider putting this (as is) into the -next tree, but would like
> to see the issues with readsl/writesl sorted out and any other review
> comments sorted.
>
Thanks for merging it.  Can I merge your i2c-tegra tree into the tegra
for-next tree to allow some board changes that depend on the header to
go on top?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ