[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1298493173-sup-8301@think>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:35:11 -0500
From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
To: Joel Becker <jlbec@...lplan.org>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
djwong <djwong@...ibm.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mingming Cao <mcao@...ibm.com>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] block integrity: Fix write after checksum calculation problem
Excerpts from Joel Becker's message of 2011-02-23 15:24:47 -0500:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:45:44AM -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> > Also, DIX is only the tip of the iceberg. Many other impending
> > technologies feature checksums and require pages to be stable during I/O
> > due to checksumming, encryption and so on.
> >
> > The VM is already trying to do the right thing. We just need the
> > relevant filesystems to catch up.
>
> ocfs2 handles stable metadata for its checksums when feeding
> things to the journal. If we're doing pagecache-based I/O, is the
> pagecache going to help here for data?
Data is much easier than metadata. All you really need is to wait on
writeback in file_write, wait on writeback in page_mkwrite, and make
sure you don't free blocks back to the allocator that are actively under
IO.
I expect the hard part to be jbd and metadata in ext34.
-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists