[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110223204528.GZ2163@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 12:45:28 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, dhowells@...hat.com,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, darren@...art.com,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 11/11] rcu: move TREE_RCU from softirq
to kthread
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 01:24:34PM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2011, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > Reschedules can happen in this case due to CPU hotplug events. :-(
>
> Lockout cpu hotplug instead of disabling interrupts? Systems that support
> cpu hotplug in hardware are rare and so the cpu hotplug locking may be
> become noop.
Good point!
However, the local_irq_save() is doing two things here: (1) blocking
CPU hotplug and (2) synchronizing with concurrent invocations of
invoke_rcu_cpu_kthread() from irq handlers.
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists