[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <A1F3067C9B68744AA19F6802BAB8FFDC060ECE@TK5EX14MBXC227.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 22:48:27 +0000
From: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
CC: Hank Janssen <hjanssen@...rosoft.com>,
KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
"Abhishek Kane (Mindtree Consulting PVT LTD)"
<v-abkane@...rosoft.com>, "gregkh@...e.de" <gregkh@...e.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.osdl.org" <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/4] staging: hv: Fix the code depending on struct
vmbus_driver_context data order
> From: Greg KH [mailto:greg@...ah.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 4:27 PM
> > struct driver_context {
> > struct hv_guid class_id;
> > -
> > struct device_driver driver;
> > + struct hv_driver *hv_drv;
>
> If you have a pointer to hv_driver, why do you need a full 'struct
> device_driver' here? That sounds really wrong.
>
> Actually, having 'struct device_driver' within a structure called
> "driver_context" seems wrong, this should be what 'struct hv_driver'
> really is, right?
The hv_driver contains Hyper-V specific data, like hv_guid. But the
struct driver_context contains data and functions related to Linux
kernel side, such as the struct device_driver defined by kernel. So,
they are kept separately.
(just saw Ky's email, which further explained the layering.)
Thanks,
- Haiyang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists