[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110223230654.GA18829@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:06:54 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
Cc: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Hank Janssen <hjanssen@...rosoft.com>,
"Abhishek Kane (Mindtree Consulting PVT LTD)"
<v-abkane@...rosoft.com>, "gregkh@...e.de" <gregkh@...e.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.osdl.org" <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] staging: hv: Fix the code depending on struct
vmbus_driver_context data order
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:55:12PM +0000, Haiyang Zhang wrote:
> > From: Greg KH [mailto:greg@...ah.com]
> > The layering is almost ok, there is still one more layer here than is
> > needed, and it should be removed (I already removed lots of layers that
> > were not needed, just didn't get to this one.) But the naming also
> > needs to be fixed up as it is wrong from a "driver model" standpoint
> > with the rest of the kernel.
>
> So, how about rename the "struct driver_context" to "struct gen_drv_ctx"
> in this patch? We can deal with the layering in next round of patches.
No, it's not a "driver context" at all. It is a "hyperv driver", so
name it as such.
A "context" is a void pointer or something that the driver uses
privately. And you already have a pointer to the context in the base
structure so you don't need your own.
You should work on removing the layering now, that will clean this all
up.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists