linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Weight-balanced binary tree + KVM growable memory slots using wbtree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1298426179.1668.35.camel@x201>
Date:	Tue, 22 Feb 2011 18:56:19 -0700
From:	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To:	avi@...hat.com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	mtosatti@...hat.com, xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Weight-balanced binary tree + KVM growable
 memory slots using wbtree

On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 11:54 -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> This series introduces a new weight-balanced binary tree (wbtree) for
> general use.  It's largely leveraged from the rbtree, copying it's
> rotate functions, while introducing different rebalance and erase
> functions.  This tree is particularly useful for managing memory
> ranges, where it's desirable to have the most likely targets (the
> largest ranges) at the top of each subtree.
> 
> Patches 2 & 3 go on to convert the KVM memory slots to a growable
> array and make use of wbtree for efficient managment.  Trying to
> exercise the worst case for this data structure, I ran netperf
> TCP_RR on an emulated rtl8139 NIC connected directly to the host
> via a tap.  Both qemu-kvm and the netserver on the host were
> pinned to optimal CPUs with taskset.  This series resulted in
> a 3% improvement for this test.

Marcelo asked about kernbench with ept=0 on this series.  Using a 4-way,
10G guest with pinned vcpus, build in tmpfs, 10x optimal run, I got:

           before (stdev)    after (stdev)     %
--------+-----------------+----------------+-------
Elapsed |  42.809 (0.19)  |  42.305 (0.23) | -1.18
User    | 115.709 (0.22)  | 114.720 (0.31) | -0.85
System  |  41.605 (0.14)  |  40.924 (0.20) | -1.64
%cpu    |   366.9 (1.45)  |   367.6 (1.51) |  0.19
context |  7272.3 (68.6)  |  7249.5 (97.8) | -0.31
sleeps  | 14826.2 (110.6) | 14798.5 (63.0) | -0.19

So, a small but measurable gain.  Also, sorry for forgetting to address
Marcelo's comments from the original version of patch 2/3, I'll pick
them up in the next round.  Thanks,

Alex

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/