linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 7/7] dt: add documentation of ARM dt boot interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 22 Feb 2011 21:55:25 -0500 (EST)
From:	Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
To:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
cc:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/7] dt: add documentation of ARM dt boot interface

On Tue, 22 Feb 2011, Grant Likely wrote:

> +The boot loader must load a device tree image (dtb) into system ram
> +at a 64bit aligned address and initialize it with the boot data.
[...]
> +                r2 : physical pointer to the device-tree block
> +                (defined in chapter II) in RAM.  Device tree can be located
> +                anywhere in system RAM, but it should be aligned on a 32 bit
> +                boundary.

So... which one is true?


Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/