[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1298548167.2428.41.camel@twins>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 12:49:27 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
richard.purdie@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched: allow users with rtprio rlimit to change
from SCHED_IDLE policy
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 13:28 -0800, Darren Hart wrote:
> From: Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>
> Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 15:37:07 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH] sched: allow users with sufficient RLIMIT_NICE to change from SCHED_IDLE policy
>
> The current scheduler implementation returns -EPERM when trying to change from
> SCHED_IDLE to SCHED_OTHER or SCHED_BATCH.
> Since SCHED_IDLE is considered to be
> equivalent to a nice 20,
Well, its not quite equivalent, its actually 5 times lighter still and
the preemption behaviour is slightly different as you've found ;-)
> changing to another policy should be allowed provided
> the RLIMIT_NICE is accounted for.
>
> This patch allows the following test-case to pass with RLIMIT_NICE=40, but still
> fail with RLIMIT_NICE=10 when the calling process is run from a typical shell
> (nice 0, or 20 in rlimit terms).
>
> Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>
> CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> CC: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...uxfoundation.org>
> ---
> kernel/sched.c | 11 +++++++----
> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> index 18d38e4..9bf6284 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -4822,12 +4822,15 @@ recheck:
> param->sched_priority > rlim_rtprio)
> return -EPERM;
> }
> +
> /*
> + * Treat SCHED_IDLE as nice 20. Only allow a switch to
> + * SCHED_NORMAL if the RLIMIT_NICE would normally permit it.
> */
> + if (p->policy == SCHED_IDLE && policy != SCHED_IDLE) {
> + if (!can_nice(p, TASK_NICE(p)))
> + return -EPERM;
> + }
>
> /* can't change other user's priorities */
> if (!check_same_owner(p))
Looks fine, thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists