[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110224004333.GA22698@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 00:43:33 +0000
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
"Gustavo F. Padovan" <padovan@...fusion.mobi>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: btusb autosuspend (was Re: Linux 2.6.38-rc6)
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 04:25:23PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Hmm. Is there any reason we shouldn't revert commit
> 556ea928f78a390fe16ae584e6433dff304d3014 given the regression?
I think reverting makes sense at the moment. I haven't seen the reported
issues - I need to figure out if this is related to bus powered/self
powered devices, or what else is causing the difference.
> It apparently had problems before too, and caused autosuspend to be
> disabled entirely, judging at least by
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528744
>
> but there's obviously the comment about "those should be fixed now".
> Apparently there are more issues.
Right, we were autosuspending even when there were active connections.
Marcel told me that ought to be fixed and my testing seemed to agree...
> I have no idea whether this is a USB-level issue, or a driver-level
> one. There are no comments about exactly what fixed the input device
> issues. So I'm adding both BT and USB people to the discussion.
I'll try to get time to look at this this week. Marcel, any ideas?
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists