[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110224151238.GA16916@albatros>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 18:12:38 +0300
From: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kees Cook <kees.cook@...onical.com>,
Eugene Teo <eugene@...hat.com>,
Dan Rosenberg <dan.j.rosenberg@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: module loading with CAP_NET_ADMIN
Hi netdev folks,
I'd like to discuss the ability to load any modules from /lib/modules/
by a process with CAP_NET_ADMIN. Since Linux 2.6.32 [1] there is such
possibility:
root@...atros:~# grep Cap /proc/$$/status
CapInh: 0000000000000000
CapPrm: fffffffc00001000
CapEff: fffffffc00001000
CapBnd: fffffffc00001000
root@...atros:~# lsmod | grep xfs
root@...atros:~# ifconfig xfs
xfs: error fetching interface information: Device not found
root@...atros:~# lsmod | grep xfs
xfs 767011 0
exportfs 4226 2 xfs,nfsd
Ability of CAP_NET_ADMIN to load the driver to work with a particular
network device is rational; however, one may load any module not even
related to network this way. Hopefully, this is not equal to
CAP_SYS_MODULE since the module set is restricted to /lib/modules
(additionally may be disabled with /proc/sys/kernel/modules_disabled),
but the idea of non-netdev module loading is weird.
My proposal is changing request_module("%s", name) to something like
request_module("netdev-%s", name) inside of dev_load() and adding
aliases to related drivers. This would allow to load only netdev
modules via these ioctls. I'm not sure what modules should be patches -
at least real physical netdevices have names different from drivers'
names, so they don't need patching. I suppose the list is not big.
Any comments are welcome.
[1] http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=a8f80e8ff94ecba629542d9b4b5f5a8ee3eb565c
Thanks,
--
Vasiliy Kulikov
http://www.openwall.com - bringing security into open computing environments
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists