[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110224153855.GA25590@xanatos>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 07:38:55 -0800
From: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...sta.com>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/3] xhci: Fix cycle bit calculation during stall
handling.
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 02:18:24PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 24-02-2011 5:31, Sarah Sharp wrote:
>
> >+ if (ep_ring->first_seg == ep_ring->first_seg->next&&
> >+ state->new_deq_ptr < dev->eps[ep_index].stopped_trb)
> >+ state->new_cycle_state ^= 0x1;
>
> The last line seems overindented.
Hi Sergei,
checkpatch.pl doesn't complain about it. It is not a good use of my
time to respin this patch for one stylistic change that is not a
violation of the Kernel community norms.
I really feel strongly that you are wasting the community's time by
commenting on style when it is only a violation of your personal style,
without providing any useful feedback on the code itself.
I feel so strongly that I'm seriously considering setting up a feedback
bot for you. It would run any patch you reply to through checkpatch.pl,
and send you a small reminder when the patch passes, but you complained
about style. I think it would allow you to have a sense of how
frustrating it is to receive these unnecessary stylistic comments.
Sarah Sharp
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists