[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110224182226.GB18081@suse.de>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 10:22:26 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Jean Pihet <j-pihet@...com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [15/70] perf timechart: Adjust perf timechart to the new power
events
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 01:17:19AM +0100, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I should have split out this segfault fix.
>
> On Tuesday 22 February 2011 23:16:54 Greg KH wrote:
> > 2.6.37-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let
> > us know.
> >
> > ------------------
> >
> > From: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
> >
> > commit 20c457b8587bee4644d998331d9e13be82e05b4c upstream.
> >
> > [This patch is part of mainline git commit 20c457b8587bee4644d9.
> > This should fix:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-perf-
> > users@...r.kernel.org/msg00057.html
> >
> > The regression was introduced by git commit:
> > 4c21adf26f8fcf86a755b9b9f55c2e9fd241e1fb]
> Above link is a nice pointer.
> the rest of the changelog (below) does not fit and describes
> the mainline patch, the tiny fix was part of.
>
> Don't know whether it's worth to touch it, but if, the changelog (or
> title) of the patch should be as short as:
> perf: timechart (userspace): Do not segfault on power_end events
I'll leave it as-is as I like to keep the commit messages as close as
possible.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists