[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1102242056010.2701@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 20:56:45 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
cc: David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] msm: scm: Get cacheline size from CTR
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 02/24/2011 11:01 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> /**
> >> * scm_call() - Send an SCM command
> >> * @svc_id: service identifier
> >> @@ -243,11 +248,13 @@ int scm_call(u32 svc_id, u32 cmd_id, const void *cmd_buf, size_t cmd_len,
> >> do {
> >> u32 start = (u32)rsp;
> >> u32 end = (u32)scm_get_response_buffer(rsp) + resp_len;
> >> - start &= ~(CACHELINESIZE - 1);
> >> + u32 cacheline_size = dcache_line_size();
> >
> > And why do you want to do that on every scm_call() invocation and on
> > every loop of that code? If your dcache_line_size() changes at
> > runtime, then you might have other problems.
>
> I definitely don't want to do it for every loop. I'm fine with getting
> it every scm_call() invocation though.
>
> For now, I'll pull the end and cacheline_size variables out of the
> do-while loop.
Why not do it correct right away and retrieve it in an __init
function?
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists