[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110224201504.GA12913@void.printf.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 20:15:04 +0000
From: Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>
To: Philip Rakity <prakity@...vell.com>
Cc: "Dong, Chuanxiao" <chuanxiao.dong@...el.com>,
Jae hoon Chung <jh80.chung@...il.com>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1]mmc: set timeout for SDHCI host before sending busy
cmd
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:32:30AM -0800, Philip Rakity wrote:
> proposed this a while ago and strongly support just removing the quirk for broken timeout and setting the timeout value to maximum of 0xE.
>
> This also handles the case of the sd device having a timeout value too low. In my testing I have come across SD cards that do not provide the correct value.
> We force our pxa168, pxa910, and mmp2 controllers to have 0xE.
Yeah, OLPC's CaFe controller -- which might be the same hardware as yours,
actually -- has the same problem.
Does anyone know of a reason (beyond strict spec-compliance, I suppose)
for honoring the timeout value rather than using 0xE everywhere? If not,
I'm willing to try out Philip's suggestion.
Thanks,
--
Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org> <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists