lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 24 Feb 2011 20:15:04 +0000
From:	Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>
To:	Philip Rakity <prakity@...vell.com>
Cc:	"Dong, Chuanxiao" <chuanxiao.dong@...el.com>,
	Jae hoon Chung <jh80.chung@...il.com>,
	"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1]mmc: set timeout for SDHCI host before sending busy
	cmd

On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:32:30AM -0800, Philip Rakity wrote:
> proposed this a while ago and strongly support just removing the quirk for broken timeout and setting the timeout value to maximum of 0xE.
> 
> This also handles the case of the sd device having a timeout value too low.  In my testing I have come across SD cards that do not provide the correct value.
> We force our pxa168, pxa910, and mmp2 controllers to have 0xE.  

Yeah, OLPC's CaFe controller -- which might be the same hardware as yours,
actually -- has the same problem.

Does anyone know of a reason (beyond strict spec-compliance, I suppose)
for honoring the timeout value rather than using 0xE everywhere?  If not,
I'm willing to try out Philip's suggestion.

Thanks,

-- 
Chris Ball   <cjb@...top.org>   <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ