[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1298580589.5226.836.camel@laptop>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 21:49:49 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-hotplug@...r.kernel.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, amit.kucheria@...aro.org,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 2/2] tracing, perf : add cpu hotplug trace events
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 15:40 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 15:24 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> >
> > > Most SMP ARM processors are going to use it soon. Powering down idle
> > > cores provides substantial power saving.
> >
> > And why can't regular idle paths be used? CPU hotplug is a massively
> > expensive operation.
>
> The idle path assumes that the CPU state is preserved.
Not much of it,
> We're talking
> about cores completely going down with power pulled beneath them and
> eventually rebooted dynamically here.
I think you can get away with actually pulling the power and re-initing
the cpu to idle from the idle path and the rest of the kernel not
caring.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists