[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1102251049090.2701@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 10:54:28 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Pratheesh Gangadhar <pratheesh@...com>
cc: davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com, hjk@...sjkoch.de,
gregkh@...e.de, sshtylyov@...sta.com, arnd@...db.de,
amit.chatterjee@...com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] PRUSS UIO driver support
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011, Pratheesh Gangadhar wrote:
> +static irqreturn_t pruss_handler(int irq, struct uio_info *dev_info)
> +{
> + void __iomem *base = dev_info->mem[0].internal_addr;
> + void __iomem *intren_reg = base + PINTC_HIER;
> + void __iomem *intrstat_reg = base + PINTC_HIPIR + ((irq - 1) << 2);
> + int val = ioread32(intren_reg), intr_mask = (1 << (irq - 1));
> +
> + /* Is interrupt enabled and active ? */
> + if (!(val & intr_mask) && (ioread32(intrstat_reg) & HIPIR_NOPEND))
> + return IRQ_NONE;
> +
> + /* Disable interrupt */
> + iowrite32((val & ~intr_mask), intren_reg);
> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
Hmm, just noticed, that you fiddle with the interrupt enable register
here totally unprotected. So on a SMP system you might haandle two
different interrupts at the same time. That wants locking.
And even on UP, you have a problem as you reenable that thing from
user space which requires a read modify write. Racy as hell.
Please look at the other UIO drivers which have the same problem.
Sorry for not noticing earlier!
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists