[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1PslLC-0000rj-EF@eag09.americas.sgi.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 18:15:26 -0600
From: Cliff Wickman <cpw@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, paulus@...ba.org, mingo@...e.hu,
acme@...stprotocols.net
Subject: [RFC] Performance Events 'Samples' report
From: Cliff Wickman <cpw@....com>
The perf command's report prints clock periods under the heading of 'Samples'.
Our applications people have been confused by this "Samples" heading.
perf report -n
# Overhead Samples Command Shared Object Symbol
# ........ .......... ............... .................... ................................
#
99.41%1522136216246 pthreads pthreads [.] work_function
0.33% 4980298302 perf [kernel.kallsyms] [k] clear_page_c
....
It would be more compact to print the number of samples. And that would
be consistent with the heading.
Below is the code that displays the periods. I don't see that the number
of samples is available here, but probably easily could be.
I presume that clock periods are derived from #samples * sample period.
perf/util/hist.c
640
641 if (symbol_conf.show_nr_samples) {
642 if (sep)
643 ret += snprintf(s + ret, size - ret, "%c%" PRIu64, *sep, period);
644 else
645 ret += snprintf(s + ret, size - ret, "%11" PRIu64, period);
646 }
647
Signed-off-by: Cliff Wickman <cpw@....com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists