linux-kernel - Re: bug in 2.6.32-5-amd64 : aufs/memory management related?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 26 Feb 2011 01:36:22 +0900
From:	"J. R. Okajima" <hooanon05@...oo.co.jp>
To:	"Emmanuel V." <antro5@...e.fr>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bug in 2.6.32-5-amd64 : aufs/memory management related?


"Emmanuel V.":
> $ cat /proc/version
> Linux version 2.6.32-5-amd64 (Debian 2.6.32-30) (ben@...adent.org.uk) (gcc version 4.3.5 (Debian 4.3.5-4) ) #1 SMP Wed Jan 12 03:40:32 UTC 2011
>
> $ dmesg
>
> [...]
> [10688.154693] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [10688.154741] kernel BUG at /build/buildd-linux-2.6_2.6.32-30-amd64-d4MbNM/linux-2.6-2.6.32/debian/build/source_amd64_none/mm/mmap.c:873!
	:::

According to http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=607879,
Debian people already fixed this problem (although I am afraid they are
still using an obsoleted version of aufs).

And this is debian specific problem and aufs is not in mainline. I don't
think this ML is appropriate for such problem.


J. R. Okajima
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/