lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikXUyQy+fjFSwagB3Uud2JPodsR2yFtt+jiZPSk@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 25 Feb 2011 10:32:55 +0800
From:	Po-Yu Chuang <ratbert.chuang@...il.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	bhutchings@...arflare.com, joe@...ches.com, dilinger@...ued.net,
	mirqus@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net,
	Po-Yu Chuang <ratbert@...aday-tech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ref0] net: add Faraday FTMAC100 10/100 Ethernet driver

Hi Eric,

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 1:48 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> Le jeudi 24 février 2011 à 18:39 +0100, Eric Dumazet a écrit :
>> Le jeudi 24 février 2011 à 17:29 +0800, Po-Yu Chuang a écrit :
>> > From: Po-Yu Chuang <ratbert@...aday-tech.com>
>> > +
>> > +static bool ftmac100_rx_packet(struct ftmac100 *priv, int *processed)
>> > +{
>> > +   struct net_device *netdev = priv->netdev;
>> > +   struct ftmac100_rxdes *rxdes;
>> > +   struct sk_buff *skb;
>> > +   struct page *page;
>> > +   dma_addr_t map;
>> > +   int length;
>> > +
>> > +   rxdes = ftmac100_rx_locate_first_segment(priv);
>> > +   if (!rxdes)
>> > +           return false;
>> > +
>> > +   if (unlikely(ftmac100_rx_packet_error(priv, rxdes))) {
>> > +           ftmac100_rx_drop_packet(priv);
>> > +           return true;
>> > +   }
>> > +
>> > +   /*
>> > +    * It is impossible to get multi-segment packets
>> > +    * because we always provide big enough receive buffers.
>> > +    */
>> > +   if (unlikely(!ftmac100_rxdes_last_segment(rxdes)))
>> > +           BUG();
>> > +
>> > +   /* start processing */
>> > +   skb = netdev_alloc_skb_ip_align(netdev, ETH_HLEN);
>>
>> Oh I see... You should allocate a bigger head (say... 128 bytes)
>>
>> And copy in it up to 128 bytes of first part... this to avoid upper
>> stack to reallocate skb head (because IP/TCP processing need to get
>> their headers in skb head)
>
> Take a look at drivers/net/niu.c :
>
> #define RX_SKB_ALLOC_SIZE   128 + NET_IP_ALIGN
>
> static int niu_process_rx_pkt(...)
> {
>        ...
>        skb = netdev_alloc_skb(np->dev, RX_SKB_ALLOC_SIZE);
>        ...
>        while (1) {
>                ...
>                niu_rx_skb_append(skb, page, off, append_size);
>        }
> }

Oh I got it.

I will try this and redo the benchmarking.

Thanks,
Po-Yu Chuang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ