[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D690842.6090706@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 09:03:46 -0500
From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
CC: preining@...ic.at,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rajiv Andrade <srajiv@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"debora@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <debora@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tpm_tis: Use timeouts returned from TPM
On 02/26/2011 08:49 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 02/26/2011 02:48 PM, Stefan Berger wrote:
>> On 02/26/2011 06:45 AM, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>>> On 02/22/2011 08:41 PM, Stefan Berger wrote:
>>>> Below patch applies to the tip of the git tree.
>>>>
>>>> v2:
>>>> - adjusting all timeouts for TPM devices reporting too low timeout
>>>> numbers
>>>> - also displaying in sysfs whether the timeouts are 'original' or
>>>> 'adjusted'
>>>>
>>>> The current TPM TIS driver in git discards the timeout values returned
>>>> from the TPM. The check of the response packet needs to consider that
>>>> the return_code field is 0 on success and the size of the expected
>>>> packet is equivalent to the header size + u32 length indicator for the
>>>> TPM_GetCapability() result + 3 timeout indicators of type u32.
>>>>
>>>> Since some TPMs seem to return timeouts in msec rather than usec,
>>>> I am now adjusting all the timeouts rather than just the one for short
>>>> durations.
>>>>
>>>> I am also adding a sysfs entry 'timeouts' showing the timeouts that are
>>>> being used.
>>> It works:
>> 'It' means also 'suspend' works?
> Yes.
>
That's great! Thanks for testing the patch!
Stefan
> regards,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists