linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Add ``cloneconfig'' target

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTikQY03RXDE02-egVEVCwWkFNLe1ynm8LoMWKvPK@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 26 Feb 2011 18:50:19 -0500
From:	Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@...il.com>
To:	Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>
Cc:	Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Roman Zippel <zippel@...ux-m68k.org>,
	linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add ``cloneconfig'' target

Hi,

On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com> wrote:
> I added bzip2 as an exercise. But realistically, what would be wrong
> with distributors deciding to ship /boot/config-$UNAME_RELEASE.bz2 and
> saving a bit of valuable /boot disk space?
>
I don't really care, that's outside of kconfig prerogative.

> Even if people /do/ submit patches do do all of those formats, your
> argument is based on the premise that having that ability is necessarily
> bad. I don't think we need them, but I don't think it's a good argument
> against this patch either.
>
you welcome a lot of potential bloat and wheel re-invention. Both are bad.

 - Arnaud
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/