linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/5] exec: unify compat_do

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110226125731.GA5315@redhat.com>
Date:	Sat, 26 Feb 2011 13:57:31 +0100
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, pageexec@...email.hu,
	Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>,
	Eugene Teo <eteo@...hat.com>,
	Brad Spengler <spender@...ecurity.net>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
	Milton Miller <miltonm@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] exec: unify compat_do_execve() code

On 02/26, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Once again, to me "void __user*" looks better (just simpler). In this
> case get_arg_ptr() becomes (without const/__user for the clarity)
>
> 	void *get_arg_ptr(void **argv, int argc, bool compat)
> 	{
> 		char *ptr;
>
> 	#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> 		if (unlikely(compat)) {
> 			compat_uptr_t *a = argv;
> 			compat_uptr_t p;
>
> 			if (get_user(p, a + argc))
> 				return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
>
> 			return compat_ptr(p);
> 		}
> 	#endif
>
> 		if (get_user(ptr, argv + argc))
> 			return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
>
> 		return ptr;
> 	}
>
> Otherwise, get_arg_ptr() should return conditional_user_ptr_t as well,

No, this is not true, I am stupid.

Still,

> this looks like the unnecessary complication to me, but of course this
> is subjective.
>
> So, what do you think?

Yes, please.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/