linux-kernel - Re: [klibc] [PATCH] build: Define __EXPORTED_HEADER_

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTikijjZwQp6Fer9TqRqQe=2WhSCPcDv5mczcGD8g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 27 Feb 2011 15:54:47 -0800
From:	Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	klibc@...or.com, Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [klibc] [PATCH] build: Define __EXPORTED_HEADER__

On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> On Saturday 26 February 2011, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>> >
>> > What you are proposing seems to me like a step towards giving up on
>> > this noble goal :(
>> You seem to be confusing something here. Even if klibc is one day
>> included in the kernel source then we should continue to use
>> the headers generated using "make headers_install" for building klibc.
>
> Absolutely, yes.
>
> Mike, just think of the generated header files as intermediate files
> required for building, just like the .o files that are use to build
> the library.

How is one expected to test if the files should be rebuild or not?
Forcing a headers_install as part of a build will cause the entire
userland to be rebuilt.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/