[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110227121518.GA19165@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 13:15:18 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Mike Travis <travis@....com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>, Robin Holt <holt@....com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] printk: Allocate kernel log buffer earlier
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
> You could avoid all this ugly workaround of bootmem limitations by moving the
> allocation to memblock_alloc() and desupporting the log_buf_len= boot parameter on
> non-memblock architectures.
memblock_alloc() could return -ENOSYS on architectures that do not implement it -
thus enabling such optional features without ugly #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK
conditionals.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists